Precision Performance meets secure Isolation

In the world of mission-critical embedded systems, these two technologies often compete for the heart of the processor. While they share some DNA, their roles in a modern system architecture are fundamentally different.

SYSGO Blog

Navigating the Embedded Landscape: RTOS vs. Hypervisors

Read the Blog Article

The RTOS: The Specialist for Determinism

An RTOS is engineered for one thing above all: Determinism. It ensures that high-priority tasks are executed within a strictly defined time frame, often measured in microseconds.

➡️ Focus: Task scheduling, minimal latency, and low jitter.

➡️ Best for: Single-purpose applications where missing a deadline (Worst-Case Execution Time, or $WCET$) could lead to system failure.

✅ Benefit: Ultra-lean footprint. By running "close to the metal" with minimal abstraction layers, an RTOS provides the highest possible performance-per-watt and immediate hardware response.

⚠️ Constraint: Limited Isolation. Traditionally, a standalone RTOS offers a flat memory space. If one task crashes or is compromised, it can potentially impact the entire system.

The Hypervisor: The Architect for Consolidation

A Hypervisor (specifically a Type 1 "bare-metal" hypervisor) acts as a virtualization layer that allows multiple "guest" operating systems to run on a single hardware platform.

➡️ Focus: Secure isolation, resource partitioning, and hardware consolidation.

➡️ Best for: Mixed-criticality systems where you need to run a high-level GPOS (like Linux) alongside a safety-critical application.

✅ Benefit: Fault Containment. It provides a separation kernel architecture, ensuring that a crash in a non-critical partition (e.g., a GUI) cannot interfere with a critical control loop.

⚠️ Constraint: Architectural Overhead. Introducing a virtualization layer can add complexity to the system design and, if not properly optimized, may introduce slight latency compared to a pure RTOS.

When to use which?

Deciding which path to take depends on your certification requirements and hardware complexity:

Requirement

Use an RTOS

Use a Hypervisor

Strict Determinism✅ Primary focus⚠️ Implementation dependent
Hardware Consolidation❌ (Single OS focus)✅ Run Linux + RTOS + Bare Metal
Mixed Criticality❌ High risk of interference✅ Strict spatial & temporal isolation
Security (MILS)⚠️ Limited✅ Built-in by design
System Footprint✅ Minimal/Small⚠️ Larger due to multiple OSs
Legacy Code Reuse❌ Requires porting✅ Run legacy OS as a "Guest"

Possible Use Cases

Why PikeOS? The Power of "Both"

PikeOS isn’t just an RTOS or just a Hypervisor—it is a separation kernel-based Hypervisor that provides the best of both worlds. It allows you to build a system where the "kernel" itself handles the hard real-time requirements (acting as an RTOS), while simultaneously providing the virtualized partitions required to host other operating systems.

Aerospace & Defense 

➡️ SWaP-C Reduction

To reduce Space, Weight, Power, and Cost (SWaP-C), aerospace engineers consolidate multiple Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) into one. PikeOS allows for ARINC 653 compliant partitioning, letting flight-critical controls and non-critical maintenance data share a single multicore processor without risk.

Automotive

➡️ The Software-Defined Vehicle

Modern cars require a massive amount of code. You can use PikeOS to run an Automotive Ethernet stack and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) on the same SoC as a Linux-based Infotainment system. PikeOS ensures that a bug in the Spotify app never impacts the emergency braking signal.

Industrial Automation

➡️ The Secure Edge Gateway

In the IIoT era, factory controllers must be connected to the cloud. You can run a real-time PLC (Programmable Logic Controller) in one partition and a secure VPN/Firewall in another. If the firewall faces a DDoS attack, the PLC continues to manage the assembly line without a millisecond of jitter.

Arrow

Technical Insight

Unlike standard hypervisors that add significant overhead, PikeOS is designed with a minimal Trusted Computing Base (TCB), allowing it to achieve the highest safety and security certifications (e.g., DAL A, SIL 4, ASIL D, and Common Criteria EAL 5+).